What If We Remove Tokenization In LLMs?

Introduction to Tokenization in LLMs 00:00

  • AI chatbots process text as a sequence of tokens—discrete units from a predefined vocabulary—not as raw characters.
  • Using individual characters is semantically weak, while whole words are inefficient for handling rare words, typos, or new terms.
  • Tokenization breaks text into manageable subword units, balancing semantic meaning and size.
  • The subword token approach enables efficient processing but introduces challenges such as difficulty in character counting and basic math.

Issues with Tokenization 00:43

  • Tokens are artificial abstractions that limit LLM understanding below the token level.
  • Tokenization is a separate pre-processing step requiring standalone training, which can bias models toward languages (like English) dominant in the training data.
  • Non-English languages suffer from oversegmentation, leading to longer, less meaningful sequences and reduced performance.
  • Minor typos or language variations can heavily impact tokenization, causing confusion and easier jailbreaks.
  • Computational resources are allocated equally across tokens, inefficient for simple punctuation versus dense information.

Introduction to BLT (Byte Latent Transformer) 03:59

  • BLT is a tokenizer-free architecture that processes raw bytes directly instead of tokens.
  • It forms "patches," dynamically grouped units without a fixed vocabulary, allocating more computation to semantically significant content.
  • Patches are defined dynamically so compute is focused where necessary, improving efficiency.

BLT Patch Segmentation Mechanism 04:54

  • BLT segments byte sequences into patches based on the entropy of predicting the next byte (entropy-based patching).
  • Global constraint: starts a new patch if entropy exceeds a threshold (high uncertainty).
  • Monotonic constraint: starts a new patch if there’s a sudden change in entropy.
  • Predictable sequences get longer patches (fewer steps); unpredictable, information-rich segments get shorter patches (more computational focus).

Building Meaningful Patches and Architecture Details 05:51

  • Each byte is embedded alongside its local context (n-grams) for richer semantic representation.
  • N-grams are mapped to a fixed hash size using roll polyhash to prevent an unmanageable vocabulary size.
  • Architecture involves a local encoder to create patches, a lightweight transformer for patches, and a latent global transformer for higher-level representation.
  • Instead of next-byte prediction, the model predicts the next patch representation.
  • The model concludes with a local decoder to reconstruct the byte sequence back to text.

Efficiency and Performance of BLT 07:20

  • BLT matches Llama 3 performance while using up to 50% fewer FLOPs at inference.
  • Dynamic patching and representation prediction introduce substantial inference efficiency without loss of quality.
  • Patch size can be adjusted for further efficiency gains, which is not possible in traditional token-based LLMs.

Research Outcomes and Advantages 08:04

  • This research represents the first FLOPs-controlled scaling study for byte-level models up to 8B parameters and 4 trillion training bytes, with an open-source release.
  • BLT improves performance on tasks needing subword awareness: orthographic knowledge, phonology, and low-resource machine translation.
  • BLT avoids tokenization issues, improving rare word handling and multilingual capabilities—areas problematic for current models.

Related Research and Closing Remarks 08:34

  • New research proposes compressed chunks of raw bytes as units but struggles with languages lacking explicit spaces (e.g., Chinese).
  • These architectures offer the ability to predict multiple bytes or words at once.
  • For more details, viewers are directed to the findmypapers.ai website.